Skip to content
L
Profile not reviewed by the provider

Lab0

Pipedrive CRM, sales automation & B2B integrations

No customer review published

Lab0 helps B2B SMBs structure CRM, sales automation and business integrations, with a focus on Pipedrive and Make.com.

AIPartnerLens positioning

Lab0 describes a three-layer approach: structure the sales process first, automate tasks and integrations second, and add AI when data and workflows are sufficiently clean.

Its public offering covers Pipedrive, outbound prospecting, Make.com/API integrations and selected AI-agent use cases.

  • AIPartnerLens analysis
Public budget
Unstructured origin (legacy profile) · The official website lists engagements starting at €2,500 excl. VAT for a CRM audit and up to €4,000 excl. VAT per month for a broader engagement that can include CRM setup, a prospecting system and training. Final scope and pricing should be confirmed in the proposal.
Factual review
Profile not reviewed by the provider
Do you represent Lab0? Correct or claim this profile

Verified customer reviews

Reviews of Lab0

An overall score is not enough. Each review can break down five comparable criteria to show the provider’s strengths and points to watch.

Reviews are checked manually before publication, and their verification status remains explicit. Supporting evidence stays private, and a provider’s paid listing plan never affects its scores or publication.

No customer review published

Evaluation criteria

Each criterion remains visible as a separate rating.

Score /5
  1. 01

    Scoping & business understanding

    Understanding of the need, priorities and proposed scope.

  2. 02

    AI expertise & deliverable quality

    Technical expertise, soundness of the choices made and quality of the delivered work.

  3. 03

    Communication & project management

    Clarity of communication, progress visibility and handling of unexpected issues.

  4. 04

    Budget & timeline reliability

    Alignment between the initial commitments and the actual project outcome.

  5. 05

    Production rollout & ongoing support

    Deployment, knowledge transfer, maintenance and ongoing assistance.

No verified customer review has been published on this profile yet.

Have you worked with Lab0? Rate these five criteria and share a verifiable experience.

Review Lab0
Decision-focused summary

Decide what to verify first

Factual review, plan status and editorial conclusions are handled separately.

Best fit

  • Small or mid-sized B2B company with a sales cycle that can be structured.
  • Team already using a CRM or ready to adopt Pipedrive.
  • Need to connect CRM, email, calendar, payments or business software.
  • Recurring processes stable enough to document before automation.

Poor-fit scenario

  • B2C organization or purely transactional sales model.
  • Company without a sales team or sales process to structure.
  • Need limited to a standard SaaS configuration that does not require consulting.
  • Project requiring contractual guarantees of sales results.

Evidence available

  • The website publishes a named Cabinet Amerha case study with a documented architecture (Pipedrive, Kleos, Scellius, Gmail, Google Calendar and Make.com), before/after measures and a stated €3,800 excl. VAT investment. These results are published by Lab0 and have not been independently verified by this platform. The site also states that more than 50 companies have been supported and displays several client logos.

Points to clarify

  • Confirm that the Cabinet Amerha case is comparable to the target process and request a similar reference where possible.
  • Define project KPIs and separate measured gains from commercial targets.
  • Review the legal and operational governance of automated outbound campaigns.
  • Clarify which accounts, Make.com scenarios, automations and data remain under the client's control at the end of the engagement.

Services and engagement formats

Use cases, formats, deliverables and engagement requirements.

Structured use cases

Structure and automate a sales pipeline in Pipedrive

Automate B2B prospecting, enrichment and CRM synchronization

Connect Pipedrive with business software, ERP, invoicing or payment systems through Make.com and APIs

Automate inbound qualification, meeting preparation and call summaries

Reduce duplicate data entry and administrative work around the sales cycle

Project delivery

Steps, deliverables, human validation and production deployment.
Indicative duration

Published indications vary by scope: around 1 week for a CRM audit with recommendations, 2 to 3 weeks for a full Pipedrive setup and 4 to 6 weeks for a complete prospecting system.

The site also presents a four-week audit-to-production path for some engagements.

Budget and business model

Entry budget, billing unit, source, subscriptions and included scope.
Budget details

The official website lists engagements starting at €2,500 excl.

VAT for a CRM audit and up to €4,000 excl.

VAT per month for a broader engagement that can include CRM setup, a prospecting system and training.

Final scope and pricing should be confirmed in the proposal.

Tools and integrations

Technologies, usage context and compatibility with the existing environment.
Capabilities and reference points
  • Pipedrive
  • Make.com
  • Clay
  • Smartlead
  • Gmail
  • Google Calendar
  • Business APIs
  • Hermes / OpenClaw

Client case studies and evidence

Publishable case studies, outcomes and verification level.
Evidence level

The website publishes a named Cabinet Amerha case study with a documented architecture (Pipedrive, Kleos, Scellius, Gmail, Google Calendar and Make.com), before/after measures and a stated €3,800 excl.

VAT investment.

These results are published by Lab0 and have not been independently verified by this platform.

The site also states that more than 50 companies have been supported and displays several client logos.

Documented items
  • Specialized positioning around Pipedrive, with a publicly stated Solution Provider status.
  • A named client case study with architecture, workflows, before/after results and project budget.
  • Published entry pricing and indicative delivery times for several engagement formats.
  • An explicit method that places process structure before automation and AI.
  • Documentation, training and knowledge transfer are presented as project deliverables.

Limitations and points to clarify

Prerequisites, dependencies, risks and questions to resolve before signing.
Risks
  • Results and ROI are mainly published by the provider itself.
  • Outbound campaign compliance must be scoped according to targets, channels and data used.
  • Potential dependency on Pipedrive, Make.com and other third-party tools should be included in total cost.
  • Support, maintenance, SLA and reversibility should be formalized.
To clarify before signing
  • Confirm that the Cabinet Amerha case is comparable to the target process and request a similar reference where possible.
  • Define project KPIs and separate measured gains from commercial targets.
  • Review the legal and operational governance of automated outbound campaigns.
  • Clarify which accounts, Make.com scenarios, automations and data remain under the client's control at the end of the engagement.
  • Specify AI models, subprocessors, data flows, support, maintenance and SLA when AI or agents are included.
Sources and statuses

Sources of public information

Internal comments, private fields and non-public sources are never rendered in this profile.

Public sources

5

Review

Profile not reviewed by the provider

Plan status

Basic plan

This profile has not been reviewed by the provider. Public information is presented cautiously.

Official website of Lab0https://lelab0.com/

Public source — lelab0.comhttps://lelab0.com/a-propos/

Public source — lelab0.comhttps://lelab0.com/cas-clients/cabinet-amerha/

Public source — lelab0.comhttps://lelab0.com/mentions-legales/

Public source for Lab0

Signals

Updates & signals

Editorial information, public sources and AIPartnerLens signals related to this profile.

This profile is built from public sources. Factual corrections are free.

Editorial update

August 2026

Latest editorial update

The profile is maintained as part of the AIPartnerLens market map. This signal does not imply traffic metrics or provider validation.

Correction

August 2026

Factual correction possible

A name, link, category, outdated source or factually incorrect information can be corrected free of charge.

Methodology

August 2026

Related methodology and glossary

Technical terms used in the profile link back to the B2B AI glossary, and the evaluation framework is explained in the methodology.

Do you represent Lab0?

Correct or claim this profile

A factual correction remains free. Factual review does not automatically turn the profile into a paid plan.